🔗 Share this article

The US President does not usually take counsel, particularly from international figures who often seek to flatter and compliment the American leader.

But, the Central American nation's strongman president Bukele has followed a distinct approach by calling on the White House to emulate his actions in impeaching what he terms “corrupt judges.”

His appeal for Trump to move against the US judiciary also garnered support from Maga figures, including an X post by one-time supporter the billionaire, who has previously amplified the Salvadoran's demands to oust US judges.

Growing Risks to Judicial Independence

Experts say that the leader's latest remarks occur of unprecedented threats to judicial independence and specific justices in the United States, and during a period where the Trump administration is employing comparable strong-arm tactics employed by leaders in countries such as Turkey, the European state, the Asian nation, and Bukele's own El Salvador to weaken government oversight.

Bukele's online call recently was one more in a string of provocations and claims he has leveled against the US's legal system, such as a March claim that the US was “experiencing a judicial coup,” and his mockery of a federal judge's ruling to stop removal operations sending accused undocumented individuals to his nation's harsh correctional facilities.

Criticism on Federal Judge

Bukele's impeachment call was also made amid online attacks on the state's justice Judge Immergut by White House aide Stephen Miller, former AG Pam Bondi, Musk, and Trump himself in a recent press gaggle.

Immergut had issued restraining orders blocking Trump from deploying the national guard, initially in Oregon then in California. The president has been pushing to send troops into the city, which the leader has described as “war-ravaged” based on limited, non-violent protests outside the city's federal building.

Record of Attacking Justices

The advisor, the former AG, and Musk have a history of criticizing judges who have blocked Trump's executive orders or otherwise hindered the administration's policy goals. Before resuming office recently, the president directed his supporters against judges overseeing his civil and criminal trials, who were then deluged with threats and abuse.

Monitoring groups, police departments, and the justices have pointed to a heightened climate of threats and coercion in the months since he re-entered the presidency.

Rising Risk Data

According to data collected by the US Marshals Service, in the current year through the third quarter, there were over five hundred incidents to 395 federal judges, giving rise to more than eight hundred inquiries. This year has already surpassed the first recorded year, and 2024, and is likely to top the previous year's record of over six hundred reported incidents.

The threats are not just happening at the federal level. Data from Princeton's research project indicates that there have been at least fifty-nine instances of intimidation, harassment, stalking, or violence committed against judges on the local level in the current year.

Analyst Analysis on Root Causes

Specialists say that the intimidation are a product of the rhetoric coming from top government officials.

In May, the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism (GPAHE) published a detailed report claiming that “malicious and reckless statements from White House allies and allies coincide with escalating aggressive posts on online platforms.” It noted “a 54% rise in calls for impeachment and physical intimidation against judges across digital networks from January to February of this year, the first full month of the president's term.”

Beirich, the founder of the organization, said: “Trump’s threats against judges have certainly driven digital abuse at judges and demands for ouster. Targeting the courts is one more step in Trump’s advance towards strongman rule.”

International Authoritarian Tactics

That march towards autocracy has been well-trodden in recent years in multiple countries, including by the Salvadoran.

In 2021, right after commencing a second term in the face of legal bans, the president's allies in congress voted to remove the country’s top prosecutor and five judges on the constitutional court. The justices, who had angered him by rejecting pandemic policies, were replaced by replacements selected by Bukele.

The action mirrored Viktor Orbán’s remodeling of Hungary’s court system in 2018; Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s judicial purges in 2019; and attempts at comparable actions in Israel and the European country.

Undermining Judicial Independence

Analysts say that the threats and rhetorical attacks in the US can be viewed as attempts to weaken court autonomy in a system that offers no easy way for the executive to remove judges the administration disapproves of.

Meghan Leonard, an associate professor at Illinois State University who has researched democratic decline in free nations, said the White House had learned from the examples set by authoritarians abroad.

“The administration is observing at these achievements and setbacks. They know they’re not going to be able to enact any laws that would undermine the judiciary,” she said.

Pointing to instances such as the advisor's relentless claims of nearly limitless executive power, she noted: “They directly attack the judiciary by repeating repeatedly that it is not a co-equal branch in the government structure.

“They persist in redefine the discussion by emphasizing their argument that the president has greater authority than this judicial branch, which is not how checks and balances work.”

The professor said: “Judges' only protection is public trust in the legitimacy of their capacity to make those rulings. Individual threats on top of eroding institutional legitimacy may make judges think twice about judgments that go against the sitting government, which is, of course, highly concerning for court oversight and for the political system.”

Coercion Methods

Scheppele, academic of social science and international affairs at the Ivy League school, has written about the use of “autocratic legalism” by the likes of Orbán and the Russian, and has spoken out about escalating dangers to judges in the US.

She highlighted a series of termed “harassment deliveries” this year, in which judges have received unsolicited food orders with the recipient listed as a name, the son of Justice Salas, who was killed at the judge’s home in several years ago by a gunman aiming at the judge.

“Everyone understands what it means. ‘Your address is known. You are a target,’” the professor said.

“Federal judges are protected by the Secret Service and the federal police. And these are specialized law enforcement that are placed structurally inside the Department of Justice. And Pam Bondi has been leading the criticism on federal judges.”

Government Goals

Regarding the administration’s objectives, the expert said that “impeaching a US justice is almost certainly not going to happen because it’s so hard to do. {Right now|Currently